|
|
Post by BrewCrewGuru on Mar 20, 2023 16:01:41 GMT -5
Just asking what OOTP player ratings system you prefer. 20-80 scale we are all familiar with. 0-100 scale to gives us more of a video game feel.
If you feel like you wanna express why you voted, just drop a comment. I set the poll for 2 weeks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Texas GM on Mar 20, 2023 21:27:00 GMT -5
20-80 because that’s how baseball scouting has always been
|
|
|
|
Post by Pirates GM on Mar 20, 2023 21:37:06 GMT -5
0-100. I have considerable experience with the mobile OOTP Go! app over many seasons, and attempted 20-80 for multiple years to try to be consistent with real life MLB.
I eventually changed to 0-100, and haven't looked back. 20-80 masses an inordinate amount of players in the 40-60 range to the point of no longer being accurate, as you have players with wide performance gaps rated very similarly. 0-100 spreads out the performance more, and creates more accurate ratings.
JIm
|
|
|
|
Post by raysgm on Mar 20, 2023 22:56:04 GMT -5
I don't really know enough to comment on it. I'm comfortable with the 20-80 scale in real life more than a 1-100, but I'm not sure how it plays in the game
|
|
|
|
Post by seattlegm on Mar 21, 2023 5:45:42 GMT -5
I can't believe I'm going to say this, but Jim has a point. ugg... I feel dirty.
|
|
|
|
Post by LA Angels GM on Mar 21, 2023 7:43:31 GMT -5
FYI, this is something that we can easily switch back and forth without impacting the gameplay. If we start with 20-80 and feel like we want to try 0-100 after, say, week 3, we can. Or vice versa. It's not like injuries or something else where we NEED to figure it out before the season because it has a large impact on the outcome.
|
|
